I think the Taxicab Numbers story and Major's paper show that numbers can have various associations for different people. I thought it was interesting that her paper explained the frequency of those associations through linguistics and the reality that we use words to identify those numbers so different parts of a brain form connections. It is interesting to me the history of how different cultures "named" the numbers. This topic also made me think about the book Flatland and how shapes are given personality which is similar to this. In that book, the culture of the day is reflected in how women are only lines and seen as having not very much dimension of variance. I think everyone has some associations with certain numbers even if it is through math, it is still connecting different parts of our brain.
Saturday, November 18, 2023
Maya numerals article response
Monday, November 13, 2023
Trivium & Quadrivium
I found it interesting to read about the history of Christianity interacting with the liberal arts education. I think there is still a debate present in faith communities about what knowledge is important to learn and where it conflicts with the goals of different religious groups. Can faith and math go together?
It seems that theoretical mathematics was an important study. The article mentions philosophical approaches to mathematical thinking. I think this is less of a value in our culture today and I wonder why. Perhaps society right now is more interested in making sure students have the practical skills they will need in a future profession than in developing that theoretical type of thinking.
So interesting to read about how there was a theology of numbers and numbers being gendered. I think that people today sometimes have special numbers or lucky numbers. I sometimes think there are "nice" numbers that have a kind of symmetry or pattern to them.
This article reminded me how in history we can see patterns of pendulum swinging. At one time theoretical knowledge, rhetoric and mystery might be valued and then there is a shift to very scientific knowledge or instrumental skill perhaps. I think this shows why historical understanding is important, even in mathematics. It shows us the different environments where mathematics was developed and how it was valued.
Thursday, October 19, 2023
Dancing Euclidean Proofs
I appreciated the creator's comment on how dancing through the proofs helps the participant understand the process step-by-step as opposed to looking at a completed proof. I think that doing something physically makes it easier to remember and I was reflecting on how I had to memorize so many proofs for my geometry class but if I had worked through them in an embodied way, it would have been easier to remember them.
"As we embody mathematical entities, the dance becomes symbolic of mathematics as humanity and humanity as mathematics." This quote stood out to me in the article because I like the idea of mathematics being connected to human history and something that every person can participate in. In the other video we watched about Labyrinths there were testimonies from a couple participants who said they had a lot of fear around Math but doing something embodied opening their mind to the idea that Math could be accessible and enjoyable.
I think including embodied practice is a fantastic idea in a Math classroom. I was thinking that even counting on our fingers is an embodied tool many students use - but there's actually some prejudice against it sometimes! I think with high school students it would take a little bit of work to get their buy-in as they may be concerned about what their peers think or about looking silly. Another obstacle is that it takes time/money - especially if you want to take a class on a trip to the beach for example. Also, it would be important to make sure it was accessible to all students.
Monday, October 16, 2023
Euclid and Beauty?
- Why is Euclid and Euclidean geometry still studied to this day? Why do you think this book has been so important (and incredibly popular) over centuries?
- Is there beauty in the Euclidean postulates, common notions and principles for proofs? How can we define beauty if these are considered beautiful?